Literature about scientific applications/studies involving our instruments

ICAD – in situ NOx monitor

The ICAD (iterative cavity-enhanced DOAS) method

Horbanski, M., Pöhler, D., Lampel, J., and Platt, U., Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 3365–3381, 2019.

SkySpec – passive remote sensing

VDI Guidelines 4212: Remote sensing – Atmospheric measurements using passive DOAS – Gaseous emissions and ambient air measurements

Fachbereich Umweltmesstechnik

Intercomparison of MAX-DOAS vertical profile retrieval algorithms: studies on field data from the CINDI-2 campaign

Tirpitz, J.-L., Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1–35, 2021.

Evaluating different methods for elevation calibration of MAX-DOAS (Multi AXis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) instruments during the CINDI-2 campaign

Donner, S. et al., Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 685–712, 2020.

Inter-comparison of MAX-DOAS measurements of tropospheric HONO slant column densities and vertical profiles during the CINDI-2 campaign

Wang, Y. et al., Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 5087–5116, 2020.

Shipborne MAX-DOAS measurements for validation of TROPOMI NO2 products,

Wang, P., Piters, A., van Geffen, J., Tuinder, O., Stammes, P., and Kinne, S., Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1413–1426, 2020.

Comparison of formaldehyde tropospheric columns in Australia and New Zealand using MAX-DOAS, FTIR and TROPOMI,

Ryan, R. G., Silver, J. D., Querel, R., Smale, D., Rhodes, S., Tully, M., Jones, N., and Schofield, R., Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., in review, 2020.

Intercomparison of NO2, O4, O3 and HCHO slant column measurements by MAX-DOAS and zenith-sky UV–visible spectrometers during CINDI-2

Kreher, K. et al., Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2169–2208, 2020.

Detection of O4 absorption around 328 and 419 nm in measured atmospheric absorption spectra

Lampel, J., Zielcke, J., Schmitt, S., Pöhler, D., Frieß, U., Platt, U., and Wagner, T., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1671–1683, 2018.

The tilt effect in DOAS observations

Lampel, J. et al., Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4819–4831, 2017.

MAX-DOAS measurements of HONO slant column densities during the MAD-CAT campaign: inter-comparison, sensitivity studies on spectral analysis settings, and error budget

Wang, Y. et al., Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3719–3742, 2017.

Parameterizing the instrumental spectral response function and its changes by a super-Gaussian and its derivatives

Beirle, S., Lampel, J., Lerot, C., Sihler, H., and Wagner, T.: , Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 581–598, 2017.

The impact of vibrational Raman scattering of air on DOAS measurements of atmospheric trace gases

Lampel, J., Frieß, U., and Platt, U., Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3767–3787, 2015.