Literature about scientific applications/studies involving our instruments
ICAD – in situ NOx monitor
The ICAD (iterative cavity-enhanced DOAS) method
Horbanski, M., Pöhler, D., Lampel, J., and Platt, U., Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 3365–3381, 2019.
SkySpec – passive remote sensing
VDI Guidelines 4212: Remote sensing – Atmospheric measurements using passive DOAS – Gaseous emissions and ambient air measurements
Fachbereich Umweltmesstechnik
Intercomparison of MAX-DOAS vertical profile retrieval algorithms: studies on field data from the CINDI-2 campaign
Tirpitz, J.-L., Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1–35, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1-2021
Evaluating different methods for elevation calibration of MAX-DOAS (Multi AXis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) instruments during the CINDI-2 campaign
Donner, S. et al., Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 685–712, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-685-2020
Inter-comparison of MAX-DOAS measurements of tropospheric HONO slant column densities and vertical profiles during the CINDI-2 campaign
Wang, Y. et al., Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 5087–5116, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5087-2020
Shipborne MAX-DOAS measurements for validation of TROPOMI NO2 products,
Wang, P., Piters, A., van Geffen, J., Tuinder, O., Stammes, P., and Kinne, S., Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1413–1426, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1413-2020
Comparison of formaldehyde tropospheric columns in Australia and New Zealand using MAX-DOAS, FTIR and TROPOMI,
Ryan, R. G., Silver, J. D., Querel, R., Smale, D., Rhodes, S., Tully, M., Jones, N., and Schofield, R., Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., in review, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-232
Intercomparison of NO2, O4, O3 and HCHO slant column measurements by MAX-DOAS and zenith-sky UV–visible spectrometers during CINDI-2
Kreher, K. et al., Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2169–2208, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2169-2020
Detection of O4 absorption around 328 and 419 nm in measured atmospheric absorption spectra
Lampel, J., Zielcke, J., Schmitt, S., Pöhler, D., Frieß, U., Platt, U., and Wagner, T., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1671–1683, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1671-2018
The tilt effect in DOAS observations
Lampel, J. et al., Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4819–4831, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4819-2017
MAX-DOAS measurements of HONO slant column densities during the MAD-CAT campaign: inter-comparison, sensitivity studies on spectral analysis settings, and error budget
Wang, Y. et al., Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3719–3742, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3719-2017
Parameterizing the instrumental spectral response function and its changes by a super-Gaussian and its derivatives
Beirle, S., Lampel, J., Lerot, C., Sihler, H., and Wagner, T.: , Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 581–598, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-581-2017
The impact of vibrational Raman scattering of air on DOAS measurements of atmospheric trace gases
Lampel, J., Frieß, U., and Platt, U., Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3767–3787, 2015.
